Have you ever faced the problem of your content team drowning in revision cycles? Are your publishing deadlines slipping? Is your editorial budget mysteriously increasing year after year? If you’ve experienced any of this, you’re not alone. A lot of companies underestimate their true professional editing costs, with many discovering hidden expenses only after committing to a full-time editorial staff.
While in-house editing appears to offer reliability and control, the reality is far more complex. Hidden costs – including management overhead, employee turnover, training inefficiencies, and chronic underutilization – can dramatically inflate budgets and drain your resources. These invisible expenses often make the seemingly affordable option of hiring editors internally one of the most expensive approaches to content quality management.
This is where managed editorial services like Proofed come into play. By delivering scalable, cost-efficient, high-quality editing solutions, Proofed addresses these unseen burdens while providing measurable ROI improvements.
We’ll examine how outsourced editing costs often deliver superior value compared to traditional in-house models by looking at the following four factors:
When they calculate the cost of editing teams, most organizations focus solely on base salaries, which is a critical oversight that can lead to budget shortfalls. The true financial impact of hiring editors extends far beyond their annual compensation.
The average salary for an in-house editor is ~$70,000, but that employee will cost you significantly more when you factor in:
Even more concerning than these auditions is the utilization disparity that plagues internal editorial teams. It’s quite common for full-time content editors to only operate at 75% capacity due to these three realities of the job:
In contrast, managed editorial services like Proofed maintain nearly 100% utilization rates through their hourly billing models. This efficiency means clients only pay for productive editing time, not idle periods or administrative overhead.
Research indicates that Proofed’s outsourced solution often costs less than hiring a single full-time editor while providing access to a large and diverse team of specialists.
Blue Marble, a manufacturer of children’s educational toys, reduced its annual editorial expenses by 30% while simultaneously improving content quality and turnaround times – a win-win scenario that an internal team would struggle to match.
Internal editing operations demand significant managerial investment that organizations frequently overlook when they calculate their professional editing costs. These hidden management burdens can consume 20%–30% of a content manager’s time, which represents substantial opportunity costs.
In-house editorial teams require constant oversight across multiple dimensions:
Managed editorial services eliminate these headaches through dedicated project management infrastructure. No matter how big or small your company is, Proofed will provide:
The Linux Foundation, one of the world’s largest non-profit open source organizations, streamlined its editorial process after discovering that it simply had too much writing and research to do. The organization also wanted a second set of eyes on its content.Â
After realizing that freelance editors couldn’t handle the volume while maintaining consistency, it transitioned to Proofed. Now, Linux’s team can redirect lost hours toward audience research, content strategy development, and creation, which results in a significant increase in engagement metrics.
Employee turnover represents one of the most devastating hidden costs in editorial operations.
A post by the Society for Human Resource Management talks about the real cost of recruitment. It estimates that replacing a skilled employee costs an average of $4,700. However, when considering both soft and hard costs, the expense is closer to three or four times the employee’s salary. This makes editor churn particularly expensive for content-dependent organizations.
When hiring editors, organizations must account for:
The editorial field experiences particularly high turnover rates, with many editors leaving after 18–24 months due to limited advancement opportunities, repetitive work assignments, isolation from broader business strategy, and compensation limitations.
Proofed eliminates turnover risks through our structural approach. This allows us to maintain:
This infrastructure means clients never experience service disruptions due to turnover or training. If an individual editor departs, there is always someone to replace them. This provides stability that internal teams cannot guarantee.
The most significant yet intangible cost of in-house editing lies in opportunity cost – what your team could accomplish if freed from editorial responsibilities. Poor content processes alone cost businesses a fortune in productivity losses.
When talented staff members spend time on editing tasks, they’re not available for higher-impact activities, such as:
Outsourced editing costs often deliver exponential returns by enabling internal teams to focus on revenue-generating activities. Consider three productivity improvements:
IoT Analytics, a German market research company, has a talented team of writers who create top-tier reports. However, many of them were not native English speakers, which made the editing process slow and prone to errors. The company needed a team with a history of successful work in the market research field. After enlisting Proofed’s managed editorial services, IoT’s team was able to focus on what it does best: delivering brilliant market insights.
The editorial scalability Proofed provides also enables organizations to handle volume spikes without internal resource strain, which supports business growth rather than constraining it.
While the exact amount you will spend on an in-house editor or team varies greatly based on industry and business size, looking at averages can help you better understand the hidden costs and their financial implications. Proofed’s pricing will vary based on volume and the plan you choose.
Here’s a comprehensive comparison of the price for reasonable internal and outsourced editorial solutions:
Cost Category
In-House Editing
Proofed
Base Compensation
$70,000 annual salary
$12,000 annually (minimum spending amount on subscription plan only)
Benefits and Overhead
$35,000 (50% of salary)
$2,000 (overage buffer on subscription plan only)
Management
$15,000 (manager overhead)
$0–$6000 annually (account management cost on subscription and flex plans only)
Training and Onboarding
$8,000 annually
$0 (pretrained editors)
Turnover Replacement
$4,700–$280,000 (every 2 years)
$0 (no turnover risk)
Productivity Opportunity Cost
$25,000 (conservative estimate)
$0 (enables focus)
Total Annual Investment
$157,700–$293,000
$6,000+ (based on volume and plan)
This analysis reveals several key benefits of Proofed’s managed editorial services:
The financial case becomes even more compelling when considering editorial scalability – the ability to handle two or three times the volume without hiring additional staff or managing complex workflows.
Want to save time on your content editing?
Let’s talk about the support you need.
Δ
We use cookies to give you the best possible experience with Proofed. Some are essential for this site to function; others help us understand how you use the site, so we can improve it. We may also use cookies for targeting purposes.